Dogma

1 / 55

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

This project addresses the valley along the Dender River and proposes a transformation that includes both gradual demolition and densification of existing suburban settlements. The proposed plan begins by reordering the anatomy of the valley by devising a set of small-scale intervention in the form of public facilities. These interventions form a ‘ladder’ made of paths that brings together the settlements within a more cohesive urban structure. After carefully surveying the Valley, we selected two type of settlements – the ‘block’ and ‘garden city’ – that offer great potential for retrofitting, based on their current demographic and morphological configuration.

The ‘block’ settlement is characterized by discontinuous rows of houses whose back gardens form a large void. We propose a densification process that is made possible by the residents’ commoning of their gardens in order to consolidate these fragmented spaces. As this process would make available a large quantity of land, the residents’ cooperative can allow the construction of housing containing, at the ground floor, working spaces and communal facilities shared by existing and new households. The new housing units are based on two-rooms flats whose linear arrangement allows for the potential formation of smaller or larger households depending on the users’ needs. Flexibility in the household makeup is facilitated by the fact that residents do not own a specific house, but rather a share of the whole communal system.

The ‘garden suburb’ settlement consists of two-story or three-story detached houses with front and back gardens. We propose to densify this pattern of detached houses by adding workspaces on the front garden and in between houses. Moreover, by commoning their back gardens the residents gain space to build longhouses that can contain communal facilities such as workspaces, kitchens, kindergartens, laundries and clinics. The building of these extra-spaces allows retrofitting of the single-family houses into smaller units, thus allowing for the increase of demographic density and intergenerational households.

Built and open landscape

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Built and open landscape

Dender Valley within the North-West Metropolitan Area of Europe; Dender Valley within the BAG region (Brussels, Antwerp, Ghent); Mobility network: motorways (red) and railway (green); Ribbon settlements to be demolished (red)

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Dender Valley within the North-West Metropolitan Area of Europe; Dender Valley within the BAG region (Brussels, Antwerp, Ghent); Mobility network: motorways (red) and railway (green); Ribbon settlements to be demolished (red)

Conurbation

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Conurbation

Existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Existing situation

Retrofitting strategy

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Retrofitting strategy

Shrinking: 2020

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Shrinking: 2020

Shrinking: 2060

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Shrinking: 2060

Sealed surfaces

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Sealed surfaces

Sealed surfaces

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Sealed surfaces

Anti-naturalistic desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Anti-naturalistic desealing

Anti-naturalistic desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Anti-naturalistic desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Ground desealing

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Ground desealing

Territorial strategy, existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Territorial strategy, existing situation

Territorial strategy. Marking the territorial ‘ladder’. Small-scale  interventions, stage 3

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Territorial strategy. Marking the territorial ‘ladder’. Small-scale interventions, stage 3

Paths and confetti

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Paths and confetti

Confetti: milestone

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: milestone

Confetti: bench

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: bench

Confetti: platform

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: platform

Confetti: waste collection point

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: waste collection point

Confetti: bus stop

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: bus stop

Confetti: community center

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: community center

Confetti: market hall

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: market hall

Confetti: pedestrian and cycling bridge

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Confetti: pedestrian and cycling bridge

Settlement types

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Settlement types

Selection of settlements to be retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Selection of settlements to be retrofitted

Retrofitting, stage 1 (2020)

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Retrofitting, stage 1 (2020)

Retrofitting, stage 4 (2060)

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Retrofitting, stage 4 (2060)

The Garden Suburb, retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, retrofitted

The Garden Suburb, retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, retrofitted

The Garden Suburb, existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, existing situation

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 1

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 1

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 2

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 2

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 3

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Garden Suburb, retrofitting and inserting communal facilities, phase 3

Communal longhouse

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Communal longhouse

Communal longhouse

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Communal longhouse

The Block, retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, retrofitted

The Block, retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, retrofitted

The Block, existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, existing situation

The Block, retrofitting, phase 1

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, retrofitting, phase 1

The Block, retrofitting, phase 2

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, retrofitting, phase 2

The Block, retrofitting, phase 3

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

The Block, retrofitting, phase 3

The Opposite Shore – Dender Valley

Team

Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino Tattara with Celeste Tellarini, Mariapaola Michelotto, Anna Panourgia, Antonio Paolillo, Yi Ming Wu.

 Models

Made by Mistake (Rotterdam)

photo Frans Parthesius

Client

Departement Omgeving Vlaanderen

Participation to the 17th Venice Biennale 2021 has been supported by Kunsten en Cultureel Erfgoed, Departement Cultuur, Jeugd en Media Vlaanderen

2020