Dogma

1 / 40

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

This proposal envisions a strategy for the territory along the edge of the Hoge-Kempen National Park in Limburg. The project involves both demolition and retrofitting of suburban settlements. The proposed plan begins by devising a set of small-scale interventions in the forms of community centers, platforms along the river, piers and bus stops. The goal of these interventions is to act as markers and give a legible structure to the conurbation that stretches from Lanklaar to Lanaken. Our social and spatial analysis of the area highlighted two specific settlement types that we believe are an ideal target for transformation due to their particular land use pattern.

The ‘villa park’ settlement type consists of large villas, many of which are today underused. The gradual commoning of their spacious gardens can allow the incremental building of sheds to be used as both working spaces and communal facilities. In this way the large villas can be subdivided into smaller units and thus increase the density of these settlements.

The ‘garden city’ settlement type consists of two-family detached houses with garden. We propose the possibility to build along the property line, inserting one-story structures that can be extended in time and that can host housing and working spaces. Unlike the existing houses, the new structures do not define a standardized household configuration; their fluid spatial organization allows multiple uses and forms of cohabitation.

Built and unbuilt space

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Built and unbuilt space

Hoge Kempen within the North-Western Metropolitan Area; Position of Hoge Kempen National Park; University campuses network; Transport network: time-distance by car/public transport

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Hoge Kempen within the North-Western Metropolitan Area; Position of Hoge Kempen National Park; University campuses network; Transport network: time-distance by car/public transport

Conurbation

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Conurbation

Retrofitting, existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, existing situation

Built space, phase 1

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Built space, phase 1

Retrofitting, phase 2

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, phase 2

Retrofitting, phase 3 (with new public facilities)

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, phase 3 (with new public facilities)

Paths and confetti

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Paths and confetti

Map of strategic interventions – the proposal extends the national park into the conurbation through a system of pedestrian and bicycle paths. The ‘stepping stones’ along the paths are civic centres and other public facilities that organise the different urban forms – such as the national park, the canal and the river – into a coherent urban composition. The civic centres are located at the edge of the park and help to define a new path that makes legible the border between the forest and the built landscape

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Map of strategic interventions – the proposal extends the national park into the conurbation through a system of pedestrian and bicycle paths. The ‘stepping stones’ along the paths are civic centres and other public facilities that organise the different urban forms – such as the national park, the canal and the river – into a coherent urban composition. The civic centres are located at the edge of the park and help to define a new path that makes legible the border between the forest and the built landscape

Confetti: community center

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Confetti: community center

Confetti: platform

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Confetti: platform

Confetti: pier

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Confetti: pier

Confetti: platform

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Confetti: platform

Confetti: tram stop

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Confetti: tram stop

Settlements types

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Settlements types

Selection of settlements to be retrofitted

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Selection of settlements to be retrofitted

Retrofitting, existing situation and phase 1, 2, 3 (detail)

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, existing situation and phase 1, 2, 3 (detail)

Retrofitting, phase 3 (detail)

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, phase 3 (detail)

Retrofitting, existing situation and phase 1, 2, 3 (detail)

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, existing situation and phase 1, 2, 3 (detail)

Retrofitting, phase 3 (detail)

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Retrofitting, phase 3 (detail)

The Villa Park, phasing of the retrofitting

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Villa Park, phasing of the retrofitting

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Existing situation

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 1

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 1

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 2

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 2

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 3

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Villa Park, retrofitting of the villas into multiple housing units and building of sheds for living and working. Phase 3

The Garden City, phasing of the retrofitting

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Garden City, phasing of the retrofitting

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Existing situation

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Existing situation

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 1

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 1

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 2

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 2

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 3

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

The Garden City, new cooperative housing. Phase 3

Model for assisted home

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Model for assisted home

Model for assisted home

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Model for assisted home

The Opposite Shore – Hoge Kempen

Study for urban transformation and new housing typology in Limburg (Belgium)

previously published as Park City (2016)

Team

Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino Tattara, with Andrea Migotto, Elena Calafati, Ezio Melchiorre, Tommaso Mola Meregalli, Matteo Novarino, Antonio Paolillo

Models

Made by Mistake (Rotterdam)

photo Frans Parthesius

Client

Departement Ruimte Vlaanderen

Links

http://www.toplimburg.be/publicaties